Autonomous management in contemporary art territory (Argentina 2001-2015). A methodological proposal from the possibilities of the ARS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47909/awari.78

Keywords:

autonomous management, contemporary art, C.A.R.A. project, symbolic cartographies

Abstract

The present work addresses the autonomous management in Argentine art between 2001 and 2015. The proposed analysis approach focuses on the concept of territory from a transdisciplinary perspective and in particular, in relation to the field of contemporary visual arts. In this sense, the question that shapes our work is whether these projects, which perceive themselves as autonomous, achieve real sovereignty based on their practices, or are they subject to geopolitical decisions that always end up conditioning them?. In this way, we work in the first instance with the data collected by the C.A.R.A., and later a methodological design is carried out that allows us to configure two cartographic proposals based on the ARS working synchronously with the networks and matrices obtained. From which it is sought to graph, through the UCINET software, the autonomous management in the territory and, in turn, to create a relational chromatic matrix based on behavioral registers that allow us to form a mapping of the symbolic territory towards the interior of the procedures. The results obtained give an account of a historical perspective of the autonomous management projects in the country, how the distribution of this type of proposals has been in relation to 6 regions that are governed by administration policies of the national cultural heritage, and finally, of the configuration of its own territory in which it is observed how the ways of operating the set of procedures surveyed have been in relation to the agenda of activities, the sources of financing and the communication channels used.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Benito, P. (2020). Arte contemporáneo: espacios y galerías gestionados por artistas en Mendoza (2001- 2015). Poder, circulación y comunidades en América Latina. Reflexiones teórico-metodológicas desde el análisis de redes sociales. Mendoza: Qellqasqa.

Bourdieu, P. (1995). Las reglas del arte. Génesis y estructura del campo literario. Barcelona: Anagrama.

Deleuze, G. y Guattari, F. (2002). Mil mesetas. Capitalismo y esquizofrenia. España: Pre-Textos.

Finn, J. y Hanson, A. (2017) Critical Geographies in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Geography 16 (1): 1-15

Gago, V. y Mezzadra, S. (enero-febrero de 2015). Para una crítica de las operaciones extractivas del capital. Nueva Sociedad (255), 38-52.

Giunta, A. (2009). Poscrisis. Arte argentino después de 2001. Bs As: Siglo Veintiuno

Longoni, A. (2007). Encrucijadas del arte activista en la Argentina, Ramona, (74), 31-43.

Mellado, J. P. (2015). Escenas locales. Ficción, historia y política en la gestión de arte contemporáneo. Curatoría Forense: Argentina.

Piva, A. (2013). ¿Cuánto hay de nuevo y cuánto de populismo en el neopopulismo? Kirchnerismo y peronismo en la Argentina post 2001. Trabajo y Sociedad, (21), 135-157. Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=387334693011

Proyecto C.A.R.A. (2011). Proyecto C.A.R.A. Recuperado de http://fdacma.com.ar/proyecto-cara/

Rancière, J. (2014). El reparto de lo sensible. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.

Rolnik, S. y Guattari, F. (2006). Micropolítica. Cartografías del deseo. España: Traficantes de Sueños.

Santos, M. (1990). Por una geografía nueva. España: Espasa Universidad.

Sepúlveda, F. y Petroni I. (2013). EGA. Encuentro de Gestiones Autónomas de Artes Visuales Contemporáneas. Córdoba: Curatoría Forense.

Vercauteren, D., Müller, T. y Cabbré, O. (2010). Micropolíticas de los grupos. España: Traficantes de Sueños.

Published

12-12-2020

How to Cite

Benito, P. V. (2020). Autonomous management in contemporary art territory (Argentina 2001-2015). A methodological proposal from the possibilities of the ARS. AWARI, 1(2), e017. https://doi.org/10.47909/awari.78

Issue

Section

Original article