Jumping the Gap: developing an innovative product from a Social Network Analysis perspective

Authors

  • Leandro Martín Ferron CONICET, Argentina.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47909/awari.128

Keywords:

academy-industry bonding, technology transfer, product innovation, Social Network Analysis

Abstract

The creation of new products from the bonding between science and industry incorporates aspects that can be reviewed based on the nature of the academy-business bonds, the structure of the science & technology systems, or the models of academy-industry articulation. This research proposes a novel approach based on the analysis of a case study and uses the perspective of social network analysis to reconstruct the academic-state-business links necessary for the generation of innovation. The main source of data was the narration of a key informant, taking the innovative product as the ego of the network. Knowledge circulation pathways were identified, as well as subgroups of nodes whose attributes are associated with the product's transfer, development, and financing actions. The actor with the highest degree of centrality in the network belongs to the academic sector, and he operated as a bridge that bonded the academic and state sectors. This could be an indication that the promotion of this type of profile within the academic sector could boost the development of innovative products based on scientific knowledge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arocena, R., & Sutz, J. (2005). Latin American universities: From an original revolution to an uncertain transition. Higher Education, 50, 573-592.

Brimble, P., & Florida, R. (2007). University-Industry Linkages and Economic Development: The Case of Thailand. World Development, 35(6), 1021-1036.

Cohen,M., Nelson, R., & Walsh, J. (2002). Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D2. Management Science, 48(1), 1-23.

de la Torre, E. M., Agasisti, T., & Perez-Esparrells, C. (2017). The relevance of knowledge transfer for universities’ efficiency scores: an empirical approximation on the Spanish public higher education system. Research Evaluation, 26(3), 211-229.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L., (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109-123.

Galindo, J., Sanz, P., & De Benito, J. (2011). La Universidad ante el reto de la transferencia del conocimiento 2.0: Análisis de las herramientas digitales a disposición del gesto de transferencia. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 111-126.

Gulbranddsen, M., & Slipersaeter, S. (2007). The Third mission of the entrepreneurial university model. In: Bonaccorsi.A. and Daraio, C. (Eds), Universities and Strategic Knowledge Creation. Specialization and Performance in Europe.

Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2004). Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy, 33, 1201-1215.

Mansfield (1991). Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy, 20, 1-12.

Molas-Gallart, J. (2005). Definir, quantificar i finançar la tercera missió: un debat sobre el futur de la universitat. Coneixement i societat, (7), 6-26.

Rosenberg, N. (1976). Perspectives on Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Segarra-Blasco, A., & Arauzo-Carod, J.P (2008). Sources of innovation and industry-university interaction: Evidence from Spanish firms. Research Policy, 37, 1283-1295.

Tether, B., & Tajar, A. (2008). Beyond industry-university links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organizations and the public science-base. Research Policy, 37, 1079-1095.

Published

28-02-2022

How to Cite

Martín Ferron, L. (2022). Jumping the Gap: developing an innovative product from a Social Network Analysis perspective. AWARI, 2, e026. https://doi.org/10.47909/awari.128

Issue

Section

Original article