How do people understand inequality in Chile? A study through attitude network analysis

Gonzalo Franetovic; Arturo Bertero

doi:10.47909/awari.42

Authors

Gonzalo Franetovic University of Milan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0337-0739
Arturo Bertero University of Milan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6014-1794

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47909/awari.42

Keywords:

attitudes towards inequality, social justice research, attitude networks, network analysis, Chile

Abstract

This article constitutes the first application of the attitude network approach to peoples' views on inequality. We adopt a network model in which nodes represent survey variables and edges their conditional associations. This allows us to conceptualize perceptions, beliefs, and judgments about inequality as a network of connected evaluative reactions. We analyze data from the 2019 ISSP Social Inequality Module for Chile, one of the most unequal countries in the world. Relying on a network approach, we systematically analyze the wide-ranging indicators measuring subjective inequality. Results show that conceptions regarding inequality, redistribution, taxation, and wages form a moderately connected unified belief system with a small-world structure. In addition, we stratify the sample by education, income, and social class, obtaining six attitude networks. We compare the structures of these networks, investigating differences in community membership, node centrality, and network connectivity, evidencing that people in lower social positions have a more multidimensional understanding of inequality. Our work contributes to social justice research by proposing an innovative conceptualization of these attitudes and providing evidence of their structural variation across different socioeconomic groups.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aalberg, T. (2008). Achieving Justice: Comparative Public Opinion on Income Distribution (Vol. 7). https://doi.org/10.1163/156913308x263238

Alesina, A., & Angeletos, G.-M. (2005). Fairness and Redistribution. American Economic Review, 95(4), 960–980. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828054825655

Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. (2009). Preferences for Redistribution. http://www.nber.org/papers/w14825.pdf

Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2006). Culture differences and tax morale in the United States and in Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(2), 224–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2005.09.002

Atria, J. (2022). La sociología económica y fiscal de los impuestos: perspectivas y hallazgos para Chile. Estudios Públicos, 165, 7–38. https://doi.org/10.38178/07183089/0003210505

Barnes, L. (2015). The size and shape of government: preferences over redistributive tax policy. Socio-Economic Review, 13(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu007

Berens, S. (2015). Preferences on Redistribution in Fragmented Labor Markets in Latin America and the Caribbean. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 7(3), 117–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802x1500700304

Bobzien, L., & Kalleitner, F. (2020). Attitudes towards European financial solidarity during the Covid-19 pandemic: evidence from a net-contributor country. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1836669

Borkulo, C. D. van, Bork, R. van, Boschloo, L., Kossakowski, J. J., Tio, P., Schoevers, R. A., Borsboom, D., & Waldorp, L. J. (2022). Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000476

Borsboom, D., Deserno, M. K., Rhemtulla, M., Epskamp, S., Fried, E. I., McNally, R. J., Robinaugh, D. J., Perugini, M., Dalege, J., Costantini, G., Isvoranu, A.-M., Wysocki, A. C., Borkulo, C. D. van, Bork, R. van, & Waldorp, L. J. (2021). Network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-021-00055-w

Bringmann, L. F., Elmer, T., Epskamp, S., Krause, R. W., Schoch, D., Wichers, M., Wigman, J. T. W., & Snippe, E. (2019). What do centrality measures measure in psychological networks? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128(8), 892–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000446

Carter, N. T., Lowery, M. R., Smith, R. W., Conley, K. M., Harris, A. M., Listyg, B., Maupin, C. K., King, R. T., & Carter, D. R. (2020). Understanding Job Satisfaction in the Causal Attitude Network (CAN) Model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(9), 959–993. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000469

Castillo, J. C. (2009). ¿Cuál es la brecha salarial justa? Opinión pública y legitimación de la desigualdad en Chile. Estudios Públicos, 113. https://doi.org/10.38178/cep.vi113.449

Castillo, J. C. (2011). Legitimacy of Inequality in a Highly Unequal Context: Evidence from the Chilean Case. 24, 314–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-011-0144-5

Castillo, J. C. (2012). Is Inequality Becoming Just? Changes in Public Opinion about Economic Distribution in Chile. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 31(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-9856.2011.00605.x

Castillo, J. C., García-Castro, J. D., & Venegas, M. (2022). Perception of economic inequality: concepts, associated factors and prospects of a burgeoning research agenda (Percepción de desigualdad económica: conceptos, factores asociados y proyecciones de una agenda creciente de investigación). 37, 180–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2021.2009275

Castillo, J. C., Madero-Cabib, I., & Salamovich, A. (2013). Clivajes partidarios y cambios en preferencias distributivas en Chile. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago), 33(2), 469–488. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-090x2013000200003

Castillo, J. C., Miranda, D., & Carrasco, D. (2012). Percepción de Desigualdad Económica en Chile: Medición, Diferencias y Determinantes. 21, 99–114. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-22282012000100007

Castillo, J. C., & Olivos, F. (2014). Redistribución e impuestos: Un análisis desde la opinión pública. In ["Jorge Atria"] (Ed.), Tributación en Sociedad: Impuestos y Redistribución en el Chile del Siglo XXI. (pp. 143–166). Uqbar.

Chambon, M., Dalege, J., Waldorp, L. J., Maas, H. L. J. V. der, Borsboom, D., & Harreveld, F. van. (2022). REVIEWD Tailored interventions into broad attitude networks towards the COVID-19 pandemic. PLOS ONE, 17(10), e0276439. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0276439

Chen, J., & Chen, Z. (2008). Extended Bayesian information criteria for model selection with large model spaces. Biometrika, 95(3), 759–771. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asn034

Choi, G. (2021). Individuals’ socioeconomic position, inequality perceptions, and redistributive preferences in OECD countries. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 19(2), 239–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-020-09471-6

Christensen, A. P., & Golino, H. (2021a). Estimating the Stability of Psychological Dimensions via Bootstrap Exploratory Graph Analysis: A Monte Carlo Simulation and Tutorial. Psych, 3(3), 479–500. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych3030032

Christensen, A. P., & Golino, H. (2021b). On the equivalency of factor and network loadings. Behavior Research Methods, 53(4), 1563–1580. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01500-6

Clark, A. E., & D’Ambrosio, C. (2015). Attitudes to income inequality: Experimental and survey evidence (1st ed., Vol. 2). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-59428-0.00014-x

Dablander, F., & Hinne, M. (2019). Node centrality measures are a poor substitute for causal inference. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 6846. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43033-9

Dalege, J., Borsboom, D., Harreveld, F. van, Berg, H. van den, Conner, M., & Maas, H. L. J. van der. (2016). Toward a formalized account of attitudes: The Causal Attitude Network (CAN) model. Psychological Review, 123(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039802

Dalege, J., Borsboom, D., Harreveld, F. van, & Maas, H. L. J. van der. (2017). Network Analysis on Attitudes: A Brief Tutorial. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(5), 528–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617709827

Dalege, J., Borsboom, D., Harreveld, F. van, & Maas, H. L. J. van der. (2018). The Attitudinal Entropy (AE) Framework as a General Theory of Individual Attitudes. Psychological Inquiry, 29(4), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840x.2018.1537246

Dalege, J., Borsboom, D., Harreveld, F. van, & Maas, H. L. J. van der. (2019). A Network Perspective on Attitude Strength: Testing the Connectivity Hypothesis. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(6), 746–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618781062

Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb01000.x

Edmiston, D. (2018). The poor “sociological imagination” of the rich: Explaining attitudinal divergence towards welfare, inequality, and redistribution. Social Policy & Administration, 52(5), 983–997. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12366

Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D., & Fried, E. I. (2018). Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1

Epskamp, S., & Fried, E. I. (2018). A Tutorial on Regularized Partial Correlation Networks. Psychological Methods, 23(4), 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000167

Epskamp, S., Waldorp, L. J., Mõttus, R., & Borsboom, D. (2018). The Gaussian Graphical Model in Cross-Sectional and Time-Series Data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(4), 453–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1454823

Etzioni, A. (1988). The moral dimension: Toward a new economics. Free Press.

Evans, M. D. R., & Kelley, J. (2017). Communism, Capitalism, and Images of Class: Effects of Reference Groups, Reality, and Regime in 43 Nations and 110,000 Individuals, 1987-2009. Cross-Cultural Research, 51(4), 315–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397116677963

Evans, M. D. R., Kelley, J., & Kolosi, T. (1992). Images of Class: Public Perceptions in Hungary and Australia. American Sociological Review, 57(4), 461. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096095

Evans, M. D. R., Kelley, J., & Peoples, C. D. (2010). Justifications of Inequality: The Normative Basis of Pay Differentials in 31 Nations*. Social Science Quarterly, 91(5), 1405–1431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00738.x

Fatke, M. (2018). Inequality Perceptions, Preferences Conducive to Redistribution, and the Conditioning Role of Social Position. Societies, 8(4), 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8040099

Feldman, S., & Zaller, J. (1992). The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State. 36, 268–307. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2111433

Foygel, R., & Drton, M. (2010). Extended Bayesian Information Criteria for Gaussian Graphical Models. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1011.6640

Franetovic, G., & Castillo, J.-C. (2021). Preferences for Income Redistribution in Unequal Contexts: Changes in Latin America Between 2008 and 2018. Frontiers in Sociology, 7, 806458. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.806458

Frank, D. H., Wertenbroch, K., & Maddux, W. W. (2015). Performance pay or redistribution? Cultural differences in just-world beliefs and preferences for wage inequality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 130, 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.04.001

Franko, W., Tolbert, C. J., & Witko, C. (2013). Inequality, Self-Interest, and Public Support for “Robin Hood” Tax Policies. Political Research Quarterly, 66(4), 923–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912913485441

Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2008). Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics, 9(3), 432–441. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxm045

García‐Sánchez, E., Osborne, D., Willis, G. B., & Rodríguez‐Bailón, R. (2020). Attitudes towards redistribution and the interplay between perceptions and beliefs about inequality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(1), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12326

Golino, H. F., Epskamp, S., & Voracek, M. (2017). Exploratory graph analysis: A new approach for estimating the number of dimensions in psychological research. PLOS ONE, 12(6), e0174035. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174035

Golino, H., Shi, D., Christensen, A. P., Garrido, L. E., Nieto, M. D., Sadana, R., Thiyagarajan, J. A., & Martinez-Molina, A. (2020). Investigating the performance of exploratory graph analysis and traditional techniques to identify the number of latent factors: A simulation and tutorial. Psychological Methods, 25(3), 292–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000255

Hadler, M. (2005). Why Do People Accept Different Income Ratios? 48, 131–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699305053768

ISSP Research Group. (2022). International Social Survey Programme: Social Inequality V - ISSP 2019. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14009

Janmaat, J. G. (2013). Subjective Inequality: a Review of International Comparative Studies on People’s Views about Inequality. European Journal of Sociology, 54(3), 357–389. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003975613000209

Keeley, B. (2015). Income inequality: The gap between rich and poor (Vol. 75). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264246010-en

Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1981). Beliefs about Stratification. Annual Review of Sociology, 7(1), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.07.080181.000333

Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans’ views of what is and what ought to be.

Lauritzen, S. L. (1996). Graphical models (Vol. 17). Clarendon Press.

Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. F. (1981). A Rational Theory of the Size of Government. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 914–927. https://doi.org/10.1086/261013

Mijs, J. J. B. (2018). Inequality Is a Problem of Inference: How People Solve the Social Puzzle of Unequal Outcomes. Societies, 8(3), 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8030064

Mijs, J. J. B. (2019). The paradox of inequality: income inequality and belief in meritocracy go hand in hand. Socio-Economic Review, 19(1), 7–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy051

Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F., & Skvoretz, J. (2010). Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks, 32(3), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.006

Osberg, L., & Smeeding, T. (2006). “Fair” Inequality? Attitudes toward Pay Differentials: The United States in Comparative Perspective. American Sociological Review, 71(3), 450–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100305

Pons, P., & Latapy, M. (2005). Computer and Information Sciences - ISCIS 2005, 20th International Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey, October 26-28, 2005. Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/11569596_31

Schlicht-Schmälzle, R., Chykina, V., & Schmälzle, R. (2018). An attitude network analysis of post-national citizenship identities. PLoS ONE, 13(12), e0208241. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208241

Schmidt-Catran, A. W. (2016). Economic inequality and public demand for redistribution: combining cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence. Socio-Economic Review, 14(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu030

Svallfors, S. (1997). Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: A Comparison of Eight Western Nations. European Sociological Review, 13(3), 283–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018219

Trump, K. (2023). Income inequality is unrelated to perceived inequality and support for redistribution. Social Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13269

Turner-Zwinkels, F. M., & Brandt, M. J. (2022). Belief system networks can be used to predict where to expect dynamic constraint. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 100, 104279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104279

Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442. https://doi.org/10.1038/30918

Wegener, B., & Liebig, S. (1995). Dominant Ideologies and the Variation of Distributive Justice Norms: A Comparison of East and West Germany, and the United States. In Social Justice and Political Change (pp. 240–259). DE GRUYTER. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110868944.239

Wu, A. M., & Chou, K. (2017). Public Attitudes towards Income Redistribution: Evidence from Hong Kong. Social Policy & Administration, 51(5), 738–754. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12192

Zwicker, M. V., Nohlen, H. U., Dalege, J., Gruter, G.-J. M., & Harreveld, F. van. (2020). Applying an attitude network approach to consumer behaviour towards plastic. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69, 101433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101433

How do people understand inequality in Chile? A study through attitude network analysis

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

Downloads

References

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Issue

Section

Categories

License

Make a Submission

Keywords